| 内容 |
Many of the public support for the survivors of the Great East Japan Earthquake were implemented on the basis of Disaster Victim Certificate. However, it can miss assistingthe sufferers who demand special relief since it is provided solely based upon degrees of house damage. Disaster Case Management have been developed recently to tackle the problems. Given the advantages of Disaster Case Management, this study aims to examine the validity of the assist method using 2014-2017 Natori Life Recovery Panel Survey data (N=510). The statistical analyses of the data clarified the following two points: 1) The victims who could not feel life recovery during the survey period experienced full house damage, did not have family bonds, lacked social capital as both private and public goods, had physical/mental health problems in both themselves and their families, and could not be better off as compared to pre-earthquake days due to retirement. 2) Those who actually received personal support and those shown in 1) did not congruent with one another, which indicates tailored assistance did not reach the survivors who were excluded socia |